Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 8th Oct 2012 22:11 UTC
Legal Previously redacted documents presented in the Apple-Samsung case do not support Apple's claims that Samsung issued a 'copy-the-iPhone'-order to its designers. It's pretty damning. Apple has very selectively and actively deleted sections of internal Samsung documents and talks to make it seem as if Samsung's designers were ordered to copy the iPhone. With the unredacted, full documents without Apple's deletions in hand, a completely different picture emerges: Samsung's designers are told to be as different and creative as possible. There's no 'copy the iPhone'-order anywhere, as Apple claimed. Instead, it says this: "designers rightly must make their own designs with conviction and confidence; do not strive to do designs to please me (the president); instead make designs with faces that are creative and diverse." I guess my initial scepticism about the documents was not uncalled for. What do you know - lawyers twist and turn the truth. Shocker, huh?
Thread beginning with comment 537876
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
by arb1 on Tue 9th Oct 2012 00:00 UTC
Member since:

Welcome to taken outta context. Political parties been doing it since day 1.

As for jury had full document yea they probably did but they being apple home city jury only focused on what apple present outta those documents they for sure in 21 hours didn't read any of them.

Edited 2012-10-09 00:02 UTC

Reply Score: 3