Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 8th Oct 2012 22:11 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 537904
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: The proof is in the pudding
by unclefester on Tue 9th Oct 2012 05:42
in reply to "The proof is in the pudding"
RE: The proof is in the pudding
by Sauron on Tue 9th Oct 2012 08:35
in reply to "The proof is in the pudding"
What does it matter what is there in the document. Wasn't it plainly clear by looking at Samsung Galaxy S that it was a deliberate attempt to copy iPhone? It was not only the phone itself; even the packaging and charger design etc were copied from Apple. Anybody who thinks otherwise is deluding himself.
Hey! I just Rep-Rapped a rectangle with rounded corners, better leg it before the Apple Lawyers turn up huh?
RE: The proof is in the pudding
by aldo on Tue 9th Oct 2012 16:16
in reply to "The proof is in the pudding"
RE[2]: The proof is in the pudding
by jared_wilkes on Tue 9th Oct 2012 16:23
in reply to "RE: The proof is in the pudding"
No. This meeting was in February of 2010, a month before the launch of the Samsung Galaxy S. The Galaxy S was certainly already developed but there was no audience response of "perceived failings." What is being accused is that the Galaxy S is the first phone that takes this new direction, not that it comparably fails to hold up to the iPhone as previous generations of Samsung products between 2007 and 2010.
Edited 2012-10-09 16:27 UTC





Member since:
2006-09-06
What does it matter what is there in the document. Wasn't it plainly clear by looking at Samsung Galaxy S that it was a deliberate attempt to copy iPhone? It was not only the phone itself; even the packaging and charger design etc were copied from Apple. Anybody who thinks otherwise is deluding himself.