Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 9th Oct 2012 22:01 UTC
Microsoft Steve Ballmer's annual letter to shareholders makes it very clear Microsoft is at a point of no return - and in the middle of a transition into a hardware company. "This is a significant shift, both in what we do and how we see ourselves - as a devices and services company. It impacts how we run the company, how we develop new experiences, and how we take products to market for both consumers and businesses." Line. Sand.
Thread beginning with comment 538087
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: OEMs deserve to suffer
by Laurence on Wed 10th Oct 2012 13:17 UTC in reply to "RE: OEMs deserve to suffer"
Laurence
Member since:
2007-03-26

on that note, a company like HP could always decide to do something revolutionary like reinvent the linux distro. make it compatible with android apps, make their own clones of metro apps (if that crap is good enough for microsoft, it can be done by HP), whatev.

You mean like they did with WebOS?

HP aren't interested in software, they're more a hardware company. More so, a hardware company aimed largely at businesses (enterprise servers, business work stations, etc).

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: OEMs deserve to suffer
by ichi on Wed 10th Oct 2012 13:48 in reply to "RE[2]: OEMs deserve to suffer"
ichi Member since:
2007-03-06

HP aren't interested in software, they're more a hardware company.


They might be more of a hardware company, but saying that HP is not interested in software is innaccurate at best: NNM, Operations Manager, Operations Orchestration, Sitescope, BSM, Network Automation, Server Automation, Service Manager, Load Runner, UCMDB, DDMi, Storage Automation, ArcSight, TippingPoint, Data Protector...

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[4]: OEMs deserve to suffer
by Laurence on Wed 10th Oct 2012 14:26 in reply to "RE[3]: OEMs deserve to suffer"
Laurence Member since:
2007-03-26


They might be more of a hardware company, but saying that HP is not interested in software is innaccurate at best: NNM, Operations Manager, Operations Orchestration, Sitescope, BSM, Network Automation, Server Automation, Service Manager, Load Runner, UCMDB, DDMi, Storage Automation, ArcSight, TippingPoint, Data Protector...

They're all pretty much there to enable their hardware.

I will grant you that my statement was a little absolute though. It was more meant to read that their main focus is hardware

Reply Parent Score: 1