Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 8th Oct 2012 22:11 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 538136
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: lazy lazy lazy
by jared_wilkes on Wed 10th Oct 2012 16:28
in reply to "RE[3]: lazy lazy lazy"
RE[3]: lazy lazy lazy
by jared_wilkes on Wed 10th Oct 2012 16:27
in reply to "RE[2]: lazy lazy lazy"
RE[4]: lazy lazy lazy
by Thom_Holwerda on Wed 10th Oct 2012 16:39
in reply to "RE[3]: lazy lazy lazy"
I present to you Apple's selective quoting to make it seem as if a Samsung exec ordered its designers to copy the iPhone: you dismiss it.
I explain to you that Apple has been hammering on about 'wilfulness' which intrinsically means that it Samsung copied the iPhone *on purpose*, and thus that someone must have given the order to do so. Apparently, you don't understand the concept of wilfulness and dismiss it.
Another commenter then presents the following line, in which Apple literally argues that Samsung had a plan to copy the iPhone:
"Samsung’s documents show that Samsung developed an overall plan to copy Apple’s innovative designs and features [...]"
And you still insist Apple did not argue Samsung gave a copy order? What, is Samsung some sort of collective hivemind whose individual members all magically come up with the same ideas without executives calling the shots?
This is so incredibly crazy. We've given you everything you asked for and more, and yet you continue to ask for more 'proof'. Yes, this is EXACTLY like people asking for ever more missing links - and that's not trolling, it's a pointy simile to illustrate how ridiculous you sound.
Edited 2012-10-10 16:40 UTC





Member since:
2005-06-29
You sound like one of those people who keep asking for ever more missing links between ape and man. Each time a new link is found, you shift the goalposts and demand yet another link. Lather, rinse, repeat.
Fascinating.