Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 10th Oct 2012 22:37 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 538218
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Comment by joekiser
by Clinton on Thu 11th Oct 2012 07:18
in reply to "RE: Comment by joekiser"
RE[2]: Comment by joekiser
by kurkosdr on Thu 11th Oct 2012 09:24
in reply to "RE: Comment by joekiser"
I actually like Unity too. It has some flaws, like the faux-OS X "global menubar" and the close icon being on the left, but the alternative is Gnome 3, Gnome 2 and "3 guys hacking" (cinnamon). Gnome 2 and Cinnamon feel a bit dated for my taste. And KDE lost it's way long ago IMO.
Canonical could play their cards right (for example, be carefull with X.org upgrades) and take advantage of the radical shift Windows 8 is doing to grab some marketshare.
Edited 2012-10-11 09:28 UTC
Fallback (Gnome3) is an import option
by pepa on Thu 11th Oct 2012 11:06
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by joekiser"





Member since:
2008-11-25
I feel that it is very much a good thing that users do not have a direct say in what canonical does, as if they did, they would probably still be running gmome2 or cinnamon, and I *despised* gnome2.
Unity is what made me finally swap to Linux, after years of going back and forth, drooling over KDE features.Nowadays, I refuse to use a desktop without searchable menus instead of the old heirachical model.
Point is, those who yell the loudest are not necessarily always representative of every user, and if they had their say, I wouldn't be using this lovely, keyboard-based UI, but would be stuck waving a dammed mouse around every time I wanted to open a file or application, or access a non-hotkeyed menu item, like opening a VPN connection.