To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
This is exactly my point. The wealthiest consumers buy the iPhone, but the U.S. market presents greater access to a broader demographic (phones are subsidized, the majority will have to tolerate a relatively expensive contract or bills of comparable size to a contract, larger middle class and higher standard of living) so the iPhone achieves greater penetration with 30+% market share and we see a declining share % through the other more-developed, high-access markets down to the power, less-developed countries.
So a reasonable presumption is that Apple retains the bulk of the high end of the market regardless of whether it has a higher or lower market share.
Again, I'm presenting other equally seemingly "logical" "assumptions" that may or not be correct and we do not have the data for.
Edited 2012-10-11 06:27 UTC




Member since:
2010-06-25
wealthier people have a preference for the iPhone - How would this affect in USA? Does it matter how wealthy you are when you can get a subsidized mobile?

What i get is that young people desire iPhone looking at subsidized markets where price evens out. But prefer Android where they have to pay for it like India