Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 8th Oct 2012 22:11 UTC
Legal Previously redacted documents presented in the Apple-Samsung case do not support Apple's claims that Samsung issued a 'copy-the-iPhone'-order to its designers. It's pretty damning. Apple has very selectively and actively deleted sections of internal Samsung documents and talks to make it seem as if Samsung's designers were ordered to copy the iPhone. With the unredacted, full documents without Apple's deletions in hand, a completely different picture emerges: Samsung's designers are told to be as different and creative as possible. There's no 'copy the iPhone'-order anywhere, as Apple claimed. Instead, it says this: "designers rightly must make their own designs with conviction and confidence; do not strive to do designs to please me (the president); instead make designs with faces that are creative and diverse." I guess my initial scepticism about the documents was not uncalled for. What do you know - lawyers twist and turn the truth. Shocker, huh?
Thread beginning with comment 538270
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[9]: lazy lazy lazy
by TM99 on Thu 11th Oct 2012 08:10 UTC in reply to "RE[8]: lazy lazy lazy"
TM99
Member since:
2012-08-26

I have some questions for you with regards to this 'argument', and please answer it honestly.

Are you a lawyer? Are you even a paralegal? Have you ever had graduate level courses in business law as part of any of your educational experience?

Reply Parent Score: 2