Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 11th Oct 2012 14:43 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 538486
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Comment by MOS6510
by Thom_Holwerda on Fri 12th Oct 2012 17:01
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by MOS6510"
In The Netherlands, where the iPhone holds 20% and Android 70%, this is not the case.
http://gs.statcounter.com/#mobile_browser-NL-monthly-201208-201209
They're not clear about whether or not the iPad is a mobile device - but I'm guessing it is, which would explain the - still - relatively high iOS share.
RE[3]: Comment by MOS6510
by lordmorgul on Fri 12th Oct 2012 23:02
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by MOS6510"




Member since:
2009-08-22
I wonder if this relates to a strange phenomena reported many times and from many sources which is that iOS users actually use their phones for platform functions (web, email, photography, social networking etc) far more than Android users. For example Chikita has just conducted a user agent analysis on millions of mobile ad impressions, spanning a 7-day time frame from October 3rd through October 9th, 2012. Looking solely at impressions coming from the iPhone 5 and Galaxy S III, they were able to observe the difference in Web traffic volume between the two devices, 18 days since the public release of the iPhone 5 and four months after the SIII release in the US. The newest Apple device has already overtaken the Galaxy S III in terms of Web traffic volume.
http://insights.chitika.com/2012/iphone-5-galaxy-s-iii-study/
This report is matched by many others all pointing to the same conclusion, people are doing much less stuff with their Android phones than with their iPhones.
I don't why this is happening but the scale of the mismatch between market share and usage is so large and so well confirmed through research that it cries out for explanation.
My favoured explanation will probably not sit well with some people. I think most people don't buy their Android phones because they are looking for the best smart phone platform. They buy them because that is what is being punted by the carriers or retailers, and because the want a modern looking phone with a touch screen but they don't really want to use them for much more than phoning and texting. But I could be wrong because there is little data about what drives actual usage patterns on the two platforms.
I would love to hear any other ideas people have as to why Android users just don't seem to use so many platform functions as much. It's certainly a bit puzzling.