Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 12th Oct 2012 23:06 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 538527
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: All I've ever thought about DNT...
by ssokolow on Sat 13th Oct 2012 00:34
in reply to "All I've ever thought about DNT... "
If you don't mind my asking, how would you have thought of it if it had been presented, persistently, in terms of a checkbox labelled with "Request that all participating sites opt me out of being tracked" (Sort of like how Firefox labels the checkbox with "Tell websites I do not want to be tracked")
While I don't have time to run a study, I am quite curious how much the unfortunate naming might be affecting peoples' impressions of the feature.
Edited 2012-10-13 00:37 UTC
RE[2]: All I've ever thought about DNT...
by Lazarus on Sat 13th Oct 2012 05:21
in reply to "RE: All I've ever thought about DNT... "
If you don't mind my asking, how would you have thought of it if it had been presented, persistently, in terms of a checkbox labelled with "Request that all participating sites opt me out of being tracked"
I'd not have thought any differently about it. The problems are not how the "feature" is presented but in how it works.
Its like leaving your house unlocked all the time, putting a note on the front door letting any passer-by know that its unlocked and asking them to not do anything nefarious.
DNT is a foolish waste of time and resources.





Member since:
2005-08-10
"Do Not Track is inherently flawed because it gives people a false sense of security. Other than perhaps well-known and accountable sites, nobody's going to abide by it anyway."