Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 16th Oct 2012 12:14 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 538668
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Market comparison
by lucas_maximus on Tue 16th Oct 2012 20:09
in reply to "RE: Market comparison"
Why do you need full blown multi-tasking and windows on such a small machine is beyond me.
The multi-tasking thing is brought up again and again with Tablets and Phones ... yet iPhones and iPads sell like hot-cakes.
So most people obviously don't care.
Edited 2012-10-16 20:13 UTC
RE[2]: Market comparison
by Bill Shooter of Bul on Tue 16th Oct 2012 21:10
in reply to "RE: Market comparison"





Member since:
2006-07-14
Against the ipad and android tablets it doesn't seem so great. But really I think it will end up being compared against straight up laptops more often by people looking for laptops. Its a small light weight notebook, like a netbook with touch. You can get a decent laptop for $500 or so. The price is not terrible, but not good enough that I would suggest this over a larger laptop for most people. Its a cheap, low powered ultrabook. All the style with less sizzle. I can see some marketing people using that as a pitch: Stylish cheaper ultrabook with touch.
At that price and that market segment I think it makes sense, but I'm not sure as I'm the right one to make that judgement. I detest ultrabooks as they sacrifice performance, specs for style and higher prices.