Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 16th Oct 2012 12:14 UTC
Windows After yesterday's TV advertisement, Microsoft finally unveiled the pricing for its Surface tablet - the ARM Windows RT version that is. The cheapest Surface - 32GB without touch cover - will set you back $499. They're aiming straight for iPad pricing here, ignoring the popular cheaper Android offerings. Update: only available in Australia, Canada, China, France, Germany, Hong Kong, the United Kingdom and the United States. As usual.
Thread beginning with comment 538747
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Perfect
by galvanash on Tue 16th Oct 2012 20:27 UTC
galvanash
Member since:
2006-01-25

That is the price I said they would go with since day one...

http://www.osnews.com/thread?522834

...even after the silly rumors of $199...

http://www.osnews.com/thread?531070

...and I got modded down for it.

Yes. I'm gloating ;)

In all seriousness though, I don't really understand the objections to the price tag at this point. Very few people have even touched the thing yet, and virtually no one outside of Microsoft has used it for any extended period of time. No one really knows what $499 is getting them yet...

My contention is that Microsoft believes they have made the best hardware they could make - better than anything else on the market, including the iPad. I will obviously reserve judgement until I get to use one, but at this point I am inclined to give them the benefit of the doubt, mostly because I would really like to see someone (anyone) take on Apple at their own game.

In other words I hope it really is a game changing piece of hardware, if for no other reason than for once Apple didn't make it. If it is then $499 is a good price, if not then it will fail. Miserably.

Either way, my original argument about the pricing still stands. If it isn't worth $499, then it wouldn't be worth $299 either - the price is not the point, it never was. It is either better than an iPad or it isn't, the price really has nothing to do with its success for failure.

The Nexus 7 is a great tablet for $199. I've used it, its very nice for the price. The same can be said about many other tablets. None of them have made any serious inroads in iPad sales, and none of them even garner a second look from most iPad buyers...

The only way Microsoft can win is if they make a better product, as in just plain better. Not cheaper. Not a good comprimise. BETTER.

Reply Score: 3

RE: Perfect
by Fergy on Tue 16th Oct 2012 21:26 in reply to "Perfect"
Fergy Member since:
2006-04-10

...and I got modded down for it.

You got a score of 1 which I wouldn't call down modding. But I can understand why someone would mod you down. Long boring obvious comments with badly used bold words. Try the 144 character technique.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: Perfect
by galvanash on Tue 16th Oct 2012 21:51 in reply to "RE: Perfect"
galvanash Member since:
2006-01-25

Its 140, and I do tend to overdue it. As for bolding, its a bad habit. Im still right though. ps. your post was 200 characters... Hows that?

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE: Perfect
by MollyC on Wed 17th Oct 2012 11:49 in reply to "Perfect"
MollyC Member since:
2006-07-04

I only skimmed your post (I read it thoroughly the first time you posted it, but don't feel like doing so again), but it doesn't look like you predicted the $499 price. Looks like you recommened that price, then trashed Microsoft for going with the $199 price instead. Am I reading that wrong?

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: Perfect
by galvanash on Wed 17th Oct 2012 16:00 in reply to "RE: Perfect"
galvanash Member since:
2006-01-25

Since the $199 thing turned out to be a false rumor, I don't understand the distinction...

I was just joking about that part anyway. What matters is that they got the price right, not that I said they would.

Reply Parent Score: 2