Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 16th Oct 2012 15:47 UTC
Windows Casey Muratori dissects the consequences of Windows 8's closed distribution model. "But how realistic is the assumption that the Windows desktop will still be a usable computing platform in the future? And what would be the consequences were it to disappear, leaving Windows users with only the closed software ecosystem introduced in Windows 8? To answer these questions, this volume of Critical Detail examines the immediate and future effects of Microsoft's current certification requirements, explores in depth what history predicts for the lifespan of the classic Windows desktop, and takes a pragmatic look at whether an open or closed ecosystem would be better for Microsoft as a company." The section that details how none - none - of this year's greatest games (or last year's fantastic Skyrim) and only one of this year's Emmy-nominated TV shows pass Microsoft's rules sent chills down my spine.
Thread beginning with comment 538846
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: ReactOS
by Lennie on Wed 17th Oct 2012 10:35 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: ReactOS"
Member since:

[q]Looking to the past, they may take as many years as they took to get rid of MS-DOS, CP/M, Win16, Win32s APIs though.[/q>]

Maybe more, but that does mean the development of the Win32 API will stall, which is a good thing for Win32 API support in ReactOS and WINE.

Actually, if you look at DOS, Microsoft stopped supporting it, but dosemu and dosbox seems to deliver pretty good compatibility.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[5]: ReactOS
by moondevil on Wed 17th Oct 2012 11:05 in reply to "RE[4]: ReactOS"
moondevil Member since:

Actually Win32 development of basic APIs has stalled quite considerably since Windows XP release.

Most new Win32 APIs introduced with and after Windows XP, are actually COM objects.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[6]: ReactOS
by Lennie on Wed 17th Oct 2012 11:11 in reply to "RE[5]: ReactOS"
Lennie Member since:

I don't do Windows programming, I did dable a bit 10 years ago or something like that, it just seems like waste of time.

But what I meant is Win32 and COM together as they are both not WinRT. With Win32 I meant legacy APIs.

And yes I understand that WinRT is basically build on COM ideas.

Edited 2012-10-17 11:12 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 1