Linked by on Thu 18th Oct 2012 22:02 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 539152
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/15/13 23:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2011-04-25
I agree with your point that Google is just finding the "best" pre-production unit that OEMs are showing around and then works to rebrand it and optimize the latest OS release for it, but it's quite humorous that you refer to non-Google Android as non-AOSP.
All non-Google Android devices are AOSP. Amazon Fire, the horrible skins, locked/unlocked, anything you can think of is still AOSP-based code. That is the point of the AOSP: it is the open source code to be used by all including mods.
And of course, you can't refer to this class of Android devices as non-OHA devices because, even then -- with Google Apps and tight oversight from Google, OEMs are still allowed tremendous leeway, carriers are still allowed to lock and add bloatware...
What you are referring to is strictly unlocked, Google Android with zero skins or bloatware, provided stock as Google wants it -- i.e, the Nexus line of branded Android devices.
The chances are strong that this class will always specifically be the "Nexus" brand (and even then, sometimes the carriers will get some modifications and/or locking). I wouldn't be surprised in the least if Google/Moto continues to provide non-Nexus devices as Moto's primary clients remain the U.S. carriers.
Edited 2012-10-19 14:58 UTC