Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 18th Oct 2012 18:15 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 539259
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Why isn't the 64-bit torrent version promoted?
by Soulbender on Sun 21st Oct 2012 01:29
in reply to "RE[5]: Why isn't the 64-bit torrent version promoted?"
PAE is a hack that should not be encouraged, as Linus explains.
Indeed it is a hack but on the other hand it solves the problem for most users. Few users in Ubuntu's target demographic really need to run applications that requires more than 4GB RAM and those who do know to use 64bit.
RE[7]: Why isn't the 64-bit torrent version promoted?
by Hypnos on Sun 21st Oct 2012 03:01
in reply to "RE[6]: Why isn't the 64-bit torrent version promoted?"
You are correct that it benefits single users who do not have demanding computing tasks.
However, it's a pain for system developers who have to cater both the desktop user and the power user, as well as those writing apps for the power user. Better to drag along the desktop user into 64-bit land.




Member since:
2008-11-19
64-bit is fine; PAE is a hack that should not be encouraged, as Linus explains.
I would describe it like overused antibiotics: good for specific users, bad for the community. Luckily, 64-bit is the standard now, and every major distribution supports 32-bit emulation for apps like Skype.