Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 18th Oct 2012 18:15 UTC
Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu Ubuntu 12.10 has been released, sporting the rather... Interesting tagline 'Avoid the pain of Windows 8'. Two main features are that websites can now be treated as actual applications, integrating them into Unity. The divide between local and online content when searching has also been softened, which, they claim, makes it easier to find what you're looking for. On the server side, it includes the Folsom release of OpenStack, "Cinder, for block storage and Quantum, a virtual networking API. Ubuntu's Metal-as-a-Service bare-metal provisioning tool has been updated and now supports Calxeda hyperscale hardware based on ARM".
Thread beginning with comment 539332
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: ...
by Dave_K on Sun 21st Oct 2012 05:35 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: ..."
Dave_K
Member since:
2005-11-16

Whose white-washing anything but your own ignorance?


Fanboys often claim that Linux is just as easy to use as Windows. In fact it was claimed in this thread that using Linux would actually save time and effort. I don't think you can blame people for believing the hype.

See, you're confused. Debian is not Linux Mint. Red Hat Enterprise Linux isn't Debian, Fedora or Ubuntu. Again, do your homework.


You're missing my point. You claimed that finding out whether hardware is compatible is a quick and easy task. In reality it's complicated by all the different distributions, as just finding out that other people are successfully using a particular device with Linux isn't enough.

You don't need a graphical configuration tool to setup hardware and if you're relying on that then you don't know what you're doing and you deserve to keep paying Microsoft.


I can do without graphical tools, but given the choice I'd rather change a setting with a couple of clicks in a control panel, instead of spending time reading howto documents and editing config files. My time is worth something.

Personally, I consider graphical configuration tools to be a pretty basic feature in a modern OS. If one isn't available for a particular piece of hardware then I wouldn't consider it to be fully supported. Obviously I've been spoilt by Windows and my expectations for Linux are simply too high.

No, they don't. But why doesn't every feature work perfectly? Is it because of Linux or is it because the hardware vendor doesn't support anything other than the sacred cow Windows?


I'm not blaming Linux, but who's to blame isn't important to me as a user. What matters to me is that I can easily find hardware that does what I want and works properly with my OS.

That's made more difficult in Linux because even a distribution's official compatibility database can provide highly misleading information, listing devices as "working perfectly" when in fact significant features are non-functional.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[6]: ...
by Soulbender on Sun 21st Oct 2012 06:05 in reply to "RE[5]: ..."
Soulbender Member since:
2005-08-18

I don't think you can blame people for believing the hype.


We should all believe the Windows hype though, right?

In reality it's complicated by all the different distributions


Funny how this is always brought up as a problem. Do you also have a problem shopping in a store with more than 2-3 different brands of any product? Amazingly enough people manage this EVERY damn day yet we think they can't figure out how to chose from a few different OS products. Really?

but given the choice I'd rather change a setting with a couple of clicks in a control panel, instead of spending time reading howto documents and editing config files. My time is worth something.


So is mine which is why I got tired of having to wade through the registry trying change some setting that wasn't in the UI. It's also not much fun manually editing XML config files.
This stuff goes both ways.

Obviously I've been spoilt by Windows and my expectations for Linux are simply too high.


It's exactly the opposite for me.

That's made more difficult in Linux because even a distribution's official compatibility database can provide highly misleading information


Wow, people aren't perfect and mistakes are sometime made. Holy crap, this is ground breaking news. Good thing mistakes like this are never done anywhere else.
Seriously, come on.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[7]: ...
by Dave_K on Sun 21st Oct 2012 16:36 in reply to "RE[6]: ..."
Dave_K Member since:
2005-11-16

Funny how this is always brought up as a problem. Do you also have a problem shopping in a store with more than 2-3 different brands of any product? Amazingly enough people manage this EVERY damn day yet we think they can't figure out how to chose from a few different OS products. Really?


This is a completely nonsensical comparison. I don't have to worry about a particular tin of beans being incompatible with my brand of microwave.

So is mine which is why I got tired of having to wade through the registry trying change some setting that wasn't in the UI. It's also not much fun manually editing XML config files.
This stuff goes both ways.


In more than a decade of using Windows I've only delved into the registry a couple of times. In both cases it was to tweak some obscure setting and there was a simple and straightforward guide to follow to achieve what I wanted.

In Linux I've had to spend hours reading poorly written documentation and editing config files to achieve basic things that would take a couple of clicks in Windows.

Obviously I'm just talking about my experiences with Windows and Linux. YMMV.

Wow, people aren't perfect and mistakes are sometime made. Holy crap, this is ground breaking news. Good thing mistakes like this are never done anywhere else.


Read the post that this was responding to. They claimed that finding out if hardware is fully Linux compatible is an easy process. My point is that it's always a minefield even if someone does their homework.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[6]: ...
by lemur2 on Sun 21st Oct 2012 10:35 in reply to "RE[5]: ..."
lemur2 Member since:
2007-02-17

"{flamebait} often claim that Linux is just as easy to use as Windows. In fact it was claimed in this thread that using Linux would actually save time and effort."

Not just "claimed" but rather "shown" or "proven" or "demonstrated".

Evidence was even provided for your perusal.

Edited 2012-10-21 10:36 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[6]: ...
by lemur2 on Sun 21st Oct 2012 11:15 in reply to "RE[5]: ..."
lemur2 Member since:
2007-02-17

You're missing my point. You claimed that finding out whether hardware is compatible is a quick and easy task. In reality it's complicated by all the different distributions, as just finding out that other people are successfully using a particular device with Linux isn't enough.


Utter rubish. Get a live USB of the distribution you are investigating, and boot the machine you are investigating from that live USB.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Live_USB

"Like live CDs, live USBs can be used in embedded systems for system administration, data recovery, or the testing of operating system distributions without committing to a permanent installation on the local hard disk drive."

Here is a FOSS live USB creator program for Windows, to make it easy for you:

http://www.linuxliveusb.com/

I can do without graphical tools, but given the choice I'd rather change a setting with a couple of clicks in a control panel, instead of spending time reading howto documents and editing config files. My time is worth something.


You mean like this?

http://imgur.com/gdyAa

That is the System Settings opening GUI for Kubuntu 12.10, which is of course the equivalent of Windows Control Panel. Many of those top-level icons lead to three or four lower-level icons, which in turn lead to GUI dialog boxes for configuration settings. Enjoy.

Edited 2012-10-21 11:20 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 3