Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 21st Oct 2012 15:11 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 539395
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Why the focus on screen resolution?
by zima on Sun 28th Oct 2012 23:58
in reply to "RE[3]: Why the focus on screen resolution?"
PixelQi doesn't seem to be in the same ballpark as e-ink ...kinda closer to it & print, but still much closer to normal LCD.
And on transflective screens colour will be always washed out (but who needs that for reading, anyway?)
It's really too bad that netbooks with PixelQi didn't really arrive, though.
Edited 2012-10-29 00:02 UTC




Member since:
2010-01-21
I'd probably choose Pixel Qi over e-Ink.
That way, I get all the benefits of an LCD (response time, integrated night-time lighting, color), but I get battery lifetimes in the same ballpark as e-Ink if I shut the backlight off and I've also heard they're working on models that stay color when you switch off the backlight.
(From my experiments with my Sony Reader PRS-505 and my OpenPandora, I'm inclined to believe Pixel Qi's claim that repeatedly changing the page displayed on an e-Ink screen is as electrically expensive as just using an efficient LCD with the backlight turned completely off)