Linked by Howard Fosdick on Mon 22nd Oct 2012 04:51 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 539553
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I won't count it, since Android diverged from conventional Linux on a deep level - incompatible core C library (bionic) and as result incompatible drivers and totally different architecture which doesn't share effort with the rest of the Linux world. I'd consider Android a completely different breed than what you call a Linux distro.
Well Android is not GNU/Linux for sure. But it is as much Linux as most distros. Don't forget that there are uclibc based distros out there and these are generally considered Linux too. The whole embedded Linux world probably dwarfs the desktop installs in numbers.




Member since:
2010-06-08
I won't count it, since Android diverged from conventional Linux on a deep level - incompatible core C library (bionic) and as result incompatible drivers and totally different architecture which doesn't share effort with the rest of the Linux world. I'd consider Android a completely different breed than what you call a Linux distro.