To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I know it's not illegal to own a car, but in the Dutch city of Rotterdam the policy actively look out for expensive cars with young people in them. If they can't explain how they paid for it they're in trouble.
It's comparable with having 1.001 MP3s files on your hard disk while not owning the CDs or having an iTunes account. This doesn't make them illegal files or makes the act of getting them illegal, but it may be fishy enough for the police to hassle you.
Downloading stuff is legal in The Netherlands, yet the anti-piracy foundation keeps pretending it is.
If something isn't illegal they'll try to make it so. With MP3s they might throw in a statistic saying how much music is pirated and if we stopped it music would become cheaper and artists happier. They can't stop it of course, the only victims being foolish kids, but even if they could the prices wouldn't come down anyway.
I think the problem with cyber crime is that the dangerous people aren't easily caught. These cyber crime laws will catch more normal users, a number who didn't even know their daughter downloaded some music on her parents PC, than they will real bad guys.
If you're a serious cyber criminal you'll know how they're trying to track you and you take measures. That leaves the general public.




Member since:
2008-01-01
Both old and recent history has proved, time and again, that with everything, including governments, when there are means, they will be abuse.
One phrase here is wierd 'illegal files' -- can a file be illegal? If I infringe on some property or right and thus create a file, the *act* of creating the file is illlegal. If the same file is now in posession of someone who is authorized or has the rights to use the file, then it's legal. Illegal are activities, not things. Or am I wrong?