Linked by Howard Fosdick on Mon 22nd Oct 2012 04:51 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 539921
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-09-01
I do run RHEL/CentOS as a webserver.
Here's you're problem: latest version.
RHEL is about stability. To get that stability, they sacrifice cutting edge packages for packages that are well tested, but a little out of date.
Stability vs. newness is a choice that has to be made. Ubuntu chooses newness, and the non-LTS Ubuntu may be a better fit for you. Debian (stable) chooses stability, and you would probably have complaints similar to the ones you have about RHEL/CentOS/SL.
Also, RHEL/CentOS/SL 6 is better about having newer packages then 5. The development cycle of 6 got a little out of hand, and that contributed to 5 being really stale. Red Hat has committed to a shorter release schedule in the future to keep that from happening again.
If you're using third party repos (EPEL, RPMForge, etc.), you're going to have problems unless you're very careful about what gets installed. Some repos are careful and some aren't. I've destroyed several test servers mixing repos, so it is dangerous.