Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 24th Oct 2012 22:42 UTC
Windows "After using Microsoft's Surface for the past week I can say that I honestly get it. This isn't an iPad competitor, nor is it an Android tablet competitor. It truly is something different. A unique perspective, not necessarily the right one, but a different one that will definitely resonate well with some (not all) users." AnandTech's review is positive, because they focus on Surface's potential.
Thread beginning with comment 539976
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Comment by stooovie
by Yehppael on Thu 25th Oct 2012 08:46 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by stooovie"
Member since:

Actually, not it's not. Vista and the other failures MS force fed people contributed to the steady change of the PC market.

The average person, will compare a tablet with the PC.

Games? Tablets have lousy games compared to PC, but very simple to get and install.

Viruses and malware? Tablets and smartphones don't have them as long as you stay away from shady app markets. PC's up until a few years, ago, connecting your computer to the internet for updates was enough to get it infected.

Both have problems and advantages, but PC's are seen as unreliable shoddy expensive to maintain and upgrade, toys. And Windows bears a large share of the blame.

Edited 2012-10-25 08:46 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 0

RE[5]: Comment by stooovie
by karunko on Thu 25th Oct 2012 11:17 in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by stooovie"
karunko Member since:

PC's are seen as unreliable shoddy expensive to maintain and upgrade, toys.

PCs are toys and, by your reasoning, tablets are for serious stuff?!? Okay, then! ;-)


Reply Parent Score: 4