Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 25th Oct 2012 14:52 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 540115
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: What about Turkish?
by jal_ on Fri 26th Oct 2012 09:28
in reply to "RE[2]: What about Turkish?"
I will defer to your wisdom on this, but while Altaic is controversial my understanding is that the real controversy is over the so-called "Ural-Altaic" formation
Well, there's controversy and controversy. Let's just say that Altaic has, afaik, no main stream linguistic approval.
My point was more that there are major non-Indo-European languages in Europe...or close to Europe, depending on who's counting.
Indeed, the Finnish and Hungarian you named are some other examples.




Member since:
2009-03-27
I will defer to your wisdom on this, but while Altaic is controversial my understanding is that the real controversy is over the so-called "Ural-Altaic" formation, which supposedly would bring in Finnish and Hungarian, as well. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ural–Altaic_languages
My point was more that there are major non-Indo-European languages in Europe...or close to Europe, depending on who's counting.