Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 25th Oct 2012 20:50 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 540130
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: I'd rather put my head in an oven.
by WereCatf on Fri 26th Oct 2012 15:18
in reply to "RE[3]: I'd rather put my head in an oven."
What did the wheel fix that walking needed to be fixed badly?
Just feel like pointing out that that question actually does the opposite of what you intended: the wheel provided much faster and easier means for people to transport heavy loads as compared to walking and made entirely new avenues possible, and as such it was actually a hugely beneficial "fix."
What did Charles Babbage's analytical machine fix that the French automated looms needed fixing badly?
It didn't "fix" anything in the real world at the time, but the "fix" was that it proved that such analytical machines are not only possible but will be entirely viable in time, and therefore proved that it is an area worth researching. Ie. it "fixed" a mentality in scientific circles of the time.
I don't think either of those can really be compared to Metro. (Or Unity. Or GNOME 3. Or anything the likes.)
Edited 2012-10-26 15:18 UTC
RE[5]: I'd rather put my head in an oven.
by kwan_e on Fri 26th Oct 2012 16:36
in reply to "RE[4]: I'd rather put my head in an oven."
"What did the wheel fix that walking needed to be fixed badly?
Just feel like pointing out that that question actually does the opposite of what you intended: the wheel provided much faster and easier means for people to transport heavy loads as compared to walking and made entirely new avenues possible, and as such it was actually a hugely beneficial "fix."
What did Charles Babbage's analytical machine fix that the French automated looms needed fixing badly?
It didn't "fix" anything in the real world at the time, but the "fix" was that it proved that such analytical machines are not only possible but will be entirely viable in time, and therefore proved that it is an area worth researching. Ie. it "fixed" a mentality in scientific circles of the time.
I don't think either of those can really be compared to Metro. (Or Unity. Or GNOME 3. Or anything the likes.) "
The larger point people keep missing is that you're all mistaking a semantic game for an argument. By phrasing the question as Metro "fixing" something "broken" completely mischaracterizes why Microsoft thought they needed to go the Metro route.
The fact is, while walking didn't need to be fixed, it can be improved upon. Did the inventor of the wheel know the full extent of its power? No, but it was worth a try.
In much the same way, the original iPod interface was a bit of a gamble, and many people thought it wasn't a good idea not to have an unusual interface. Same with the Ribbon interface, which by and large is accepted without much complaint.
RE[5]: I'd rather put my head in an oven.
by modmans2ndcoming on Sat 27th Oct 2012 17:48
in reply to "RE[4]: I'd rather put my head in an oven."




Member since:
2007-02-18
You do realize the fact that you even asked this question of me means you didn't actually get the point, right?
What did the wheel fix that walking needed to be fixed badly?
What did Charles Babbage's analytical machine fix that the French automated looms needed fixing badly?
In case you still haven't understood the obvious, here's a hint:
Maybe, the person I replied to (and you) are asking a leading question simply by using the word "fix".
Have a think about that.