Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 25th Oct 2012 20:50 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 540192
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Not at all, my criticism wasn't directed toward you, it was for 1c3d0g and r_a_trip but replying to your comment was a reasonable place to make my own. Sorry if I gave you that impression.
Just the opposite, I wish more people knew transsexuals and transvestites personally. Maybe then it would be harder to use them as the intolerant-example-du-jour.





Member since:
2009-03-27
Or if, you know, transsexuals or transvestites weren't referred to as revolting and disgusting. Or compared to computer UI's. Or if in the attempt to correct the first bigot's faulty analogy someone comes along and thinks it is humorous or worthwhile to explain why the bigoted analogy is faulty by exposing its technical incorrectness with an objectifying foray into human anatomy.
"Look at Nokia's N9 UI and how well it goes with that stunning hardware! It's like a blissful, successful, heteronormative marriage between a male who has the right jiggly bits and a female who has her own right jiggly bits! Because the first set of jiggly bits fill with blood when the male sees the female's jiggly bits and become stiffened which allows for the stimulation and internal lubrication of the female's not-so-jiggly bits, which allow for the entry of the stiff penis into her! What a great UI concept!"
Edited 2012-10-26 23:02 UTC