Linked by cloud on Sat 27th Oct 2012 01:05 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 540303
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[8]: lie-nux at it again.
by Laurence on Sun 28th Oct 2012 11:53
in reply to "RE[7]: lie-nux at it again."





Member since:
2011-01-28
Laurence,
"Well yeah, that's what i just said."
"Interesting concept. A little tricky to impliment I think, but it has potential."
Maybe we're misunderstanding each other, but the OOM killer I described above *is* what linux has implemented. When it's enabled (I think by default), it does not necessarily kill the requesting application, it heuristically selects a process to kill.
"The only 'safe' option would be to set everyone up with thin clients which only have a web browser installed and bookmarked link to cloud services like Google Docs."
Haha, I hear you there, but ironically I consider firefox to be one of the guilty apps. I often have to kill it as it reaches 500MB after a week of fairly routine use. I'm the only one on this computer, but if there were 4 or 5 of us it'd be a problem.
This is probably hopeless, but here is what top prints out now:
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
27407 lou 20 0 1106m 403m 24m R 4 10.0 50:27.51 firefox
21276 lou 20 0 441m 129m 5420 S 3 3.2 869:47.14 skype
I didn't realise skype was such a hog!