Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 1st Nov 2005 08:32 UTC
Internet Explorer The US Supreme Court has rejected an appeal from Microsoft, refusing to hear the software company's request that its liability in a patent-infringement case be limited to domestic sales of its web browser.
Thread beginning with comment 54037
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Invalid?
by on Tue 1st Nov 2005 14:15 UTC

Member since:

Microsoft contends the Eolas patent is invalid because the technology had already been developed and showcased in a May 1993 demonstration by another inventor, Pei-Yuan Wei.

Isn't this arguement a double edge sword? If MS said that Eolas patent is invalid, that means the patent they are going for is invalid too.