Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 29th Oct 2012 18:14 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 540407
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Removable storage means VFAT, which is patented.
I agree that it may be related to patents. But the devices all support USB OTG mode where you can connect a USB flash drive with VFAT. So that can't be the reason.
SDXC cards however may come with exFAT, which indeed requires royalty payments. The SD card association has really painted itself into a corner by choosing a patent encumbered filesystem.
No micro-SD? 16GB is pitiful if you there's no external storage (let alone 8GB). It drives me crazy that my current phone only has 32GB external storage. I can fit only a fraction of my music on there, and while I can certainly live without being able to put it all on there, it's really annoying to not be able to. And streaming services (including Google Music) don't cut it, because streaming all of that data is a total waste of money in comparison to putting the songs in local storage (it also requires have a good connection, which I don't always have).
No micro-SD? 16GB is pitiful if you there's no external storage (let alone 8GB).
That there is no external storage is not entirely correct. You can use an USB OTG cable and connect normal USB flash drives.
This is of course much less convenient than having an SD card inserted into the device.
Then get Optimus G (http://www.gsmarena.com/lg_optimus_g_e973-4941.php)





Member since:
2005-09-10
The entire reason I got my Nexus One was for the standard: earphone jack, MicroUSB plug, and micro-SD card slot.
I don't get it, why do away with micro-SD?