To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Agreed. I quite like the look of the devices, but I'd really have to hold and use on in person to judge. If it passes the touchy-feely test, AND ends up supporting 3G/LTE then I will likely be replacing my now obsolete iPad 1 with one of these.
I imagine they're crying all the way to the bank.
Retina isn't about having the highest resolution possible, its about having the highest resolution practical. They were actually quite smart about the marketing. They drew an arbitrary line called retina, saying that any greater resolution can't revel any more information to our biological eyes. So apple's response to these higher resolution screens is quite predictable: they'll say the extra pixels are wasted.
Originally they said that Retina is 300 PPI, because this is the "magic number", but the iPad 3 had less but was still Retina. Nexus 10 has exactly 300. To argue it's wasted they'd need to revise what Steve said on iPhone 4 release.
Also the argument that there's an optimal number is harder to sell. Typically when people are told that some metric is important, they are easy to convince that the more the better. See GHz, megapixels etc.





Member since:
2010-10-05
Apple should be unhappy they started this whole "retina screen" hype. Now each Apple device has a lower resolution than a respective Nexus device.
Also I do like how both devices look, at least to the extent one can judge them by pictures in play store.