To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
So I wonder, did anybody compare it (I guess there is some benchmarking software) to RISC OS running under emulation? (I suppose RPCEmu is the most readily available option? And generally, emu could be more handy in many cases... http://www.osnews.com/thread?520050 )
http://www.riscosopen.org/forum/forums/5/topics/466?page=5#posts-12... is worth looking at.
Also, this: http://www.riscos.info/pipermail/rpcemu/2012-October/001738.html
Baseline is 177868, on a RiscPC with RISC OS 4.02 ROMs, and a 202 MHz StrongARM. So, the PandaBoard ES is nearly 2.5 times as fast as a 3.4 GHz Core i7 (I'm assuming Sandy or Ivy Bridge, at that clock speed - although, I'm pretty sure RPCEmu is single-threaded or nearly so, but that just makes it more fair). Actually, for that matter, a 600 MHz BeagleBoard would be faster. (The Iyonix and Raspberry Pi, on the other hand, are not.)
Edited 2012-10-31 10:17 UTC





Member since:
2009-02-19
Gah, I forgot to clarify that that platform isn't supported under RISC OS, either.
PandaBoard ES is still the fastest.
I'm guessing the next port target that will happen is to the Arndale Board, which uses the Exynos 5 Dual. (So, same as the Nexus 10 and Series 3 Chromebook.)