Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 29th Oct 2012 18:14 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 540538
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Comment by some1
by Janglin_Jack on Tue 30th Oct 2012 15:41
in reply to "RE: Comment by some1"
Originally they said that Retina is 300 PPI, because this is the "magic number", but the iPad 3 had less but was still Retina. Nexus 10 has exactly 300. To argue it's wasted they'd need to revise what Steve said on iPhone 4 release.
Also the argument that there's an optimal number is harder to sell. Typically when people are told that some metric is important, they are easy to convince that the more the better. See GHz, megapixels etc.
RE[3]: Comment by some1
by Bill Shooter of Bul on Tue 30th Oct 2012 18:47
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by some1"





Member since:
2006-07-14
Retina isn't about having the highest resolution possible, its about having the highest resolution practical. They were actually quite smart about the marketing. They drew an arbitrary line called retina, saying that any greater resolution can't revel any more information to our biological eyes. So apple's response to these higher resolution screens is quite predictable: they'll say the extra pixels are wasted.