Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 30th Oct 2012 19:15 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 540584
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Comment by shmerl
by Alfman on Wed 31st Oct 2012 18:12
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by shmerl"
JAlexoid,
"Since when openness is the same as opensource?
Windows is not opensource, but is very much an open platform. Openness != open source."
Your basic point true, obviously. However don't you find it ironic to use windows as an example? Half of windows 8 is decidedly closed by either definition. 100% if talking about windows RT.





Member since:
2005-11-13
It also doesn't include the source code for the Google apps. When these for-profit corporations start talking about openness, what they really mean is 'openness, as long as it's convenient for us'. Which is fine, as long as you don't fall for their bullshit rhetoric, like they're somehow doing you a favor.