To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I'm not talking about the environmental aspect. I agree with you that we are generating lots of waste, but the fact that batteries aren't replaceable doesn't really factor into people's decision to buy a phone anymore.
saso,
"I'm not talking about the environmental aspect. I agree with you that we are generating lots of waste, but the fact that batteries aren't replaceable doesn't really factor into people's decision to buy a phone anymore."
Well, the sales numbers don't lie, you are right.
However a purchase of a non-battery-accessible device cannot be construed as a vote against having accessible batteries. It's a subtle distinction having to do with the granularity of choices offered.
When given no fine grained choice about the battery, consumers will buy them anyways. However given a choice we may very well learn that many consumers would prefer an accessible battery and would even be willing to pay a bit more for it.
It is plausible a manufacturer may been aware that consumers wanted battery access, and never the less decided to do away with it for selfish reasons like built in obsolescence.





Member since:
2011-01-28
saso,
WorknMan: "NO removable battery"
saso: "Again, nobody cares. We've moved on."
That's not true at all, electronic waste is a major problem and it's exacerbated when manufactures engineer non-user serviceable devices.