Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 3rd Nov 2012 01:11 UTC, submitted by Panajev
Thread beginning with comment 540932
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: "Because it sells" is the only one valid reason.
by Soulbender on Sun 4th Nov 2012 01:32
in reply to "RE[2]: "Because it sells" is the only one valid reason."
Did you honestly just compare using an OS to eating crappy food or smoking cigarettes?
No, I compared the way he came to the conclusion that it must be the best for them.
Windows may, or may not, be the best for them but it does not follow as a logical conclusion from the fact that they purchased it. Purchasing itself is not a measurement of how good a product is for you.
RE[4]: "Because it sells" is the only one valid reason.
by ilovebeer on Sun 4th Nov 2012 02:23
in reply to "RE[3]: "Because it sells" is the only one valid reason."
Purchasing itself is not a measurement of how good a product is for you.
Wrong. Purchasing decisions are certainly a metric by which you can measure value to consumers. Is it the end-all, painting the full picture? Of course not. That's just as ridiculous as the opposite, ...saying it's useless.
RE[4]: "Because it sells" is the only one valid reason.
by telns on Sun 4th Nov 2012 03:32
in reply to "RE[3]: "Because it sells" is the only one valid reason."
Purchasing itself is not a measurement of how good a product is for you.
People that go to McDonald's do so because they /think/ (rightly or wrongly) it is the best means of fulfilling all their relevant needs. Those needs include convenience, price, kid-friendliness, taste/enjoyment, time preference/hyperbolic discounting, risk tolerance, medical history, lifestyle, &c. All those factors weighed individually and subjectively lead some people to, and others away, from McDonald's.
So, good for you in what sense? Most the time that comes off (and in any public mention of McDonald's is always lurking) as good for your *health*. But health is not the only relevant factor, and is not valued as an end with identical weight by all people.
Of course sometimes people make mistakes or have poor information, whether choosing OS's or burgers. But the fact they chose otherwise than we would is not proof it was a bad decision for *them*.
Edited 2012-11-04 03:35 UTC
RE[4]: "Because it sells" is the only one valid reason.
by modmans2ndcoming on Sun 4th Nov 2012 16:36
in reply to "RE[3]: "Because it sells" is the only one valid reason."
RE[4]: "Because it sells" is the only one valid reason.
by BluenoseJake on Sun 4th Nov 2012 20:57
in reply to "RE[3]: "Because it sells" is the only one valid reason."





Member since:
2005-08-11
Did you honestly just compare using an OS to eating crappy food or smoking cigarettes? Does that mean that using OS X is equivalent to eating organic? Is using Linux the same as eating hot dogs and sausages? That analogy is broken in 19 different ways.