To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Hmm. Maybe, when I have some time off, I'll check whether I still have that unpartitioned space left on the old Celeron for testing out alternate distros.
That'd let me check out E17's performance and whether Arch's package selection meets my needs in one go.
...keeping in mind, of course, that, even on my Athlon II X2 270 with a GeForce GT430 and 16GiB of RAM, I've yet to meet a compositor as snappy as something non-composited even when only the bare desktop and Leafpad are running.
(And given that, with Kwin on minimal effects, I can toggle the "weight" I feel when dragging windows by hitting the "toggle compositing" keybind, blaming the compositing seems like an accurate conclusion to draw.)
Edited 2012-11-03 16:39 UTC





Member since:
2010-01-21
That said, the Arch Linux packages are very complete and stable enough for daily use.
Good to know. I'll probably stick with LXDE since their Debian and Ubuntu packages are nice and up to date and Arch is one of those things I keep wanting to try but never can justify time for.
Still, you didn't say anything about how it compares to LXDE, performance-wise. Are we talking a little-known alternative to LXDE or just a much lighter competitor to KDE and GNOME that LXDE still outperforms?
Edited 2012-11-03 15:21 UTC