Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 7th Nov 2012 21:36 UTC
Microsoft Bart Eppenauer, Microsoft's chief patent guy, in an interview with The Verge: "We believe our patent laws have served the country very well." Loosely translated, this reads: "This system that gives me my six-figure income and is a fine anti-competitive tool for my company have served me and my company well, the damage to the industry be damned."
Thread beginning with comment 541308
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Comment by strim
by Thom_Holwerda on Wed 7th Nov 2012 22:25 UTC in reply to "Comment by strim"
Member since:

Don't buy their products = they go bankrupt = problem solved

I don't speak Idealistisch. I only speak Cynic.

Reply Parent Score: 5

RE[2]: Comment by strim
by fukudasan on Wed 7th Nov 2012 23:55 in reply to "RE: Comment by strim"
fukudasan Member since:

Like. ;)

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[2]: Comment by strim
by bassbeast on Thu 8th Nov 2012 01:16 in reply to "RE: Comment by strim"
bassbeast Member since:

How EXACTLY is this idealistic? Remember Vista? Remember how they sank nearly a billion bucks trying to sell it and it bombed HARD?

You CAN affect a large corp like MSFT, if we geeks get together and say "It sucks!" then all those around us don't buy, and that is that. Look at the figures MSFT was "bragging" about with Win 8, they spent 2 BILLION in ads and sold 4 MILLION in licenses, that is $500 for every $40 sale...yeah, great job MSFT, way to wash the stink of Vista down the drain!

So YES Mr Holwerda we CAN make a large corp like MSFT take notice. No we won't get anybody to switch to Linux, because lets face it there is serious issues with that OS that the devs won't fix, but we can at least force a company like MSFT to change course, because no customers equals no money.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: Comment by strim
by thegman on Thu 8th Nov 2012 09:59 in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by strim"
thegman Member since:

As I understand it, Vista sold better than XP, in a given timescale. It didn't bomb in terms of sales, just critically. Of course the PC market was much bigger then when XP was launched, and when you're an effective monopoly, it's easy to sell stuff regardless of whether it's any good or not.

It would be great if geeks could affect how everyday customers make their computer buying decisions, but we can't. It's mostly fashion driven now, and even if you could dissuade a user from getting Windows 8 or whatever, what is he going to get instead? GNU/Linux/GNOME may be fun for you, but it's not much fun for the average user. The Mac is an excellent alternative, but not everyone wants one, or wants to pay what it costs.

The Microsoft monopoly, like it or not, worked. It got rid of any viable competition. If you want people to consider alternatives, those alternatives need to exist, and for the typical user, they barely do. Only the Mac can really get the average user, but that relies on them wanting one, and wanting to pay for one.

Reply Parent Score: 5