To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Well, unless there's just one "winner" network in all of this, then it will be certainly less messy... and Skype might be the closest to such status ;p
But seriously, the mess mostly got smaller over the last decade, IMHO - most of the smallish IM networks died out.
Edited 2012-11-08 04:01 UTC
There is no "winner" in this. There are and will be many participants. Saying there will be a "winner" is like saying there will be one e-mail provider eventually. That won't going to happen.
IM networks either will cooperate (read XMPP), or their users will be separated by non interoperability, like e-mail was in the prehistoric computing era. Even AOL started adding [some limited] federated XMPP support to their network. MS actually started some shifts in that direction with Windows Messenger. But they didn't go far enough.
Edited 2012-11-08 04:59 UTC
They already support XMPP (with some OAUTH based authentication), GNOME 3 Empathy support connecting to Messenger network using XMPP. What they don't support yet is federation (interconnection between XMPP providers networks), unlike Google Talk
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/live/hh826554.aspx
I hope this gateway remains and I think it should because this capitulation on MS to use the XMPP standard was to allow easier integration with businesses that wanted to provide services over Messenger





Member since:
2010-06-08
They should start supporting XMPP. Otherwise this mess will be only more messy.