Linked by Howard Fosdick on Thu 8th Nov 2012 02:24 UTC
Windows Microsoft is discontinuing Windows Live Messenger in 1st quarter 2013, forcing users to switch to Skype. Most would want to switch to Skype anyway with its more advanced capabilities, and the switch makes sense to Microsoft, since they purchased Skype for $8.5 billion last year. However, the move may be seen as typical Redmondian high-handedness by those using Messenger with dial-up. Technically Skype works with dial-up but in practice most agree you really need broadband for decent use. Will everyone view Messenger as replaceable by Skype?
Thread beginning with comment 541389
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Comment by shmerl
by shmerl on Thu 8th Nov 2012 07:41 UTC in reply to "RE[5]: Comment by shmerl"
Member since:

Well, I'm not blaming users who trade security and interoperability for perceived (rather questionable) convenience - that's just futile. I'm blaming developers who proliferate this kind of stuff.

Edited 2012-11-08 07:42 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 5

RE[7]: Comment by shmerl
by zima on Fri 9th Nov 2012 23:33 in reply to "RE[6]: Comment by shmerl"
zima Member since:

Ahh, but there will probably always be devs who "exploit" priorities of typical users, in their quest to be more ~successful - not much point in blaming them, too.

Edited 2012-11-09 23:34 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2