Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 8th Nov 2012 11:45 UTC
Microsoft "Last week I overheard two of the top Microsoft 'watchers' discuss the Office group having bet against Windows 8, presumably because Office 2013 is not fully a (set of) Metro (a.k.a., Windows Store) apps. Ok, as much as it pains me to defend Office I'm going to do so. I'm going to defend them because they are more right than wrong. Especially when you take a shareholder perspective. Not only will I defend what Office did for Windows 8, I'm going to defend some of their licensing decisions. Oh that should be fun." Insightful analysis of the current state of Office within the great context of Microsoft's current challenges. Written by Hal Berenson, former distinguished engineer and general manager at Microsoft.
Thread beginning with comment 541463
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: So what?
by darknexus on Thu 8th Nov 2012 16:41 UTC in reply to "So what?"
darknexus
Member since:
2008-07-15

I agree with most of your points, except for this one:

B. "The second headwind has been the emergence of free, or extremely inexpensive, alternatives to Office. Response: A “Home and Student” edition.
Basically this is using the monopoly money to keep competitors out of the market. An illegal practice.

While the first bit is valid, the second part is pure bullshit. It is not an illegal practice to offer a version of your product, at a cheaper rate, for various purposes. Educational discounts are not illegal. Period. Monopoly, in this particular instance, doesn't even enter into it. And, would you look at that? Despite your "monopoly" straw man, the alternatives are growing by leaps and bounds. iWork on the Mac and iPad, Google Docs on the web, etc. The market, in this case, is actually balancing itself out quite well. Those who buy office are, more often than not, *gasp* those who actually need it because of their job (e.g. they need access to Sharepoint projects). The enterprise will continue to use office for a while yet, but things always move slowly in the world of business IT, so that's far from a surprise. At the moment, everyone's benefiting. Microsoft need to get their act together, and other alternatives are gaining greater traction now than they ever have. It's about time we have some true competition in this arena, and at long last that's exactly what we're getting.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: So what?
by TemporalBeing on Thu 8th Nov 2012 18:15 in reply to "RE: So what?"
TemporalBeing Member since:
2007-08-22

Educational discounts are not illegal. Period.


Actually there is one scenarios where a Discount can be illegal - when you discount below what you filed with the Federal Government to charge the Federal Government on the GSA Schedule as by law, that is to be the lowest price.

Now, you can do it; but I wouldn't want to be you when getting caught.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: So what?
by darknexus on Fri 9th Nov 2012 03:07 in reply to "RE[2]: So what?"
darknexus Member since:
2008-07-15

Actually there is one scenarios where a Discount can be illegal - when you discount below what you filed with the Federal Government to charge the Federal Government on the GSA Schedule as by law, that is to be the lowest price.

Now, you can do it; but I wouldn't want to be you when getting caught.

Well, of course, but I really didn't think that would be relevant here considering that we're talking about a product made by Microsoft. They may screw the users more often than not, but they know how not to get in trouble with the feds. The really sad thing is, our government is as dependent on Microsoft technologies at this point as is any business, so I suppose even if Microsoft discounted below what they filed for GSA, they might still get away with it where most others wouldn't.

Reply Parent Score: 2