Linked by Howard Fosdick on Thu 8th Nov 2012 20:12 UTC
Editorial In the United States, state and local authorities are in charge of voting and the country uses more than a half dozen different voting technologies. As a result, the country can't guarantee that it accurately counts national votes in a timely fashion. This article discusses the problem and potential solutions to the U.S. voting dilemma.
Thread beginning with comment 541512
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
ID not Restrictive
by Lorin on Thu 8th Nov 2012 22:28 UTC
Lorin
Member since:
2010-04-06

Every State has a law requiring all adults to have a valid ID so the argument that having an ID to vote is restrictive is utter nonsense.

Reply Score: 4

RE: ID not Restrictive
by Morgan on Thu 8th Nov 2012 23:01 in reply to "ID not Restrictive"
Morgan Member since:
2005-06-29

Are you sure about that? Georgia doesn't require someone to have an ID for anything except entering a federal building (and that's a federal law, not state). I seriously doubt even most states have this.

Do you have any sources to back up your claim? I'm very interested in seeing them.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[2]: ID not Restrictive
by Tuishimi on Fri 9th Nov 2012 19:49 in reply to "RE: ID not Restrictive"
Tuishimi Member since:
2005-07-06

In AZ you have to identify yourself... not sure if it requires a license but that's what I was asked for in the primaries. I used early ballot in the actual election. Maybe they allow for less official forms of identification, I don't know...

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: ID not Restrictive
by sgtarky on Sat 10th Nov 2012 14:58 in reply to "RE: ID not Restrictive"
sgtarky Member since:
2006-01-02

really? you dont need iD when you are doing banking? opening a utility account? having your computer repaired at apple store(ha, had to show my ID in Augusta) getting ripped off at those pay day cash advance places. I can name many number of places that require photo id just to survive in this society

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE: ID not Restrictive
by TM99 on Fri 9th Nov 2012 00:06 in reply to "ID not Restrictive"
TM99 Member since:
2012-08-26

No, they don't. The states only require an ID to drive.

We have a national Social Security system. We have individual ID #'s assigned to us at birth.

That is all that has ever been needed.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: ID not Restrictive
by Morgan on Fri 9th Nov 2012 21:25 in reply to "RE: ID not Restrictive"
Morgan Member since:
2005-06-29

And even the Social Security system has only been in place for less than a century. The original poster still hasn't come forth with proof of his claim that all US citizens are required to carry a state ID. I think we've been trolled...

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE: ID not Restrictive
by modmans2ndcoming on Fri 9th Nov 2012 15:42 in reply to "ID not Restrictive"
modmans2ndcoming Member since:
2005-11-09

No... all states do not have such laws.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE: ID not Restrictive
by ze_jerkface on Sat 10th Nov 2012 14:28 in reply to "ID not Restrictive"
ze_jerkface Member since:
2012-06-22

Why were you voted up? There are news articles all the time on how Democrats are trying to prevent ID requirements in numerous states. I'm not a fan of either party but I side with Republicans on this one and in fact find it bizarre that this is partisan issue.

Not only did I vote without an ID but I was allowed to drop off someone else's ballot without question. It's perfectly acceptable in my state to show up with a stack of ballots to drop off.

Reply Parent Score: 2