Linked by Howard Fosdick on Thu 8th Nov 2012 20:12 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 541524
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: ID not Restrictive
by Tuishimi on Fri 9th Nov 2012 19:49
in reply to "RE: ID not Restrictive"
RE[2]: ID not Restrictive
by sgtarky on Sat 10th Nov 2012 14:58
in reply to "RE: ID not Restrictive"
really? you dont need iD when you are doing banking? opening a utility account? having your computer repaired at apple store(ha, had to show my ID in Augusta) getting ripped off at those pay day cash advance places. I can name many number of places that require photo id just to survive in this society
RE[3]: ID not Restrictive
by Morgan on Sat 10th Nov 2012 23:14
in reply to "RE[2]: ID not Restrictive"
I think you missed the point. The original poster made the erroneous statement that every state in the US requires citizens to have a state issued ID. That is simply not true, and that was what I was saying.
Private entities requiring you to show proof of ID has zero to do with state law and was not in question.




Member since:
2005-06-29
Are you sure about that? Georgia doesn't require someone to have an ID for anything except entering a federal building (and that's a federal law, not state). I seriously doubt even most states have this.
Do you have any sources to back up your claim? I'm very interested in seeing them.