Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 8th Nov 2012 20:54 UTC, submitted by Elv13
Thread beginning with comment 541568
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Dude, XFCE and whoever uses GTK is free to fork it or use another toolkit, so, what's ur point?
BTW, I haven't hear any one from the XFCE team complaining, you complaine more than them.
BTW, I haven't hear any one from the XFCE team complaining, you complaine more than them.
First, there's always selection bias to consider. Just because you didn't see it doesn't necessarily mean it didn't happen.
Second, I'm just clarifying the parts of my viewpoint which match those from the post.
Had you not begun your original comment with "Dear whiners:", I probably wouldn't have felt strongly enough about it to have replied.
Dude, XFCE and whoever uses GTK is free to fork it or use another toolkit, so, what's ur point?
The point is that you don't want to duplicate manpower simply because developers are douchebags and don't understand what the meaning of a point release is. The Gnome and GTK devs are worse than Ulrich Drepper. However, in that case you simply have to make a decision as to when it's got beyond the joke and you fork or move to something else. That will be coming.
I love it when people write stuff like 'they are free to fork it' as if they are writing that from a position of strength. In Gnome's case they are simply bleeding into total irrelevance through lack of manpower.




Member since:
2005-09-27
Dude, XFCE and whoever uses GTK is free to fork it or use another toolkit, so, what's ur point?
BTW, I haven't hear any one from the XFCE team complaining, you complaine more than them.
Edited 2012-11-09 03:11 UTC