Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 8th Nov 2012 20:54 UTC, submitted by Elv13
Thread beginning with comment 541599
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Miguel has already spoken about these criticisms.
by lucas_maximus on Fri 9th Nov 2012 13:05
in reply to "RE: Miguel has already spoken about these criticisms."
RE[3]: Miguel has already spoken about these criticisms.
by renox on Fri 9th Nov 2012 13:59
in reply to "RE[2]: Miguel has already spoken about these criticisms."
You're kidding? You can summarize his post as finger pointing: the Linux desktop is a mess (true), but it's not my fault, it's because "the Linux kernel has no internal stable API", really??
He picked THE software in a Linux distribution which has a forward compatible ABI for userspace as the reason why desktops lack stability/compatibility?
I don't remember that when he worked on Gnome he was especially pushing for compatibility, but it must be Linus's fault also.





Member since:
2005-07-06
And quite a few people found his post of a very low quality..