Linked by Howard Fosdick on Thu 8th Nov 2012 20:12 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 541602
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Is this how a modern democracy should vote?
by modmans2ndcoming on Fri 9th Nov 2012 15:53
in reply to "Is this how a modern democracy should vote?"
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-02-18
Taking a cue, not from operating systems but from computer programming, I wonder if it's actually a mistake to couple choice of policy with choice of candidate.
Especially with the coverage of American politics, it's just muddled. There's always the implication that a policy is bad if it's proposed by an incompetent politician, or that a "competent" politician is automatically right on policy issues.
I think it's getting to the point where we have to pay mind to cohesion and coupling. Vote for policies, and then vote for the people to execute them. Just because, say, universal healthcare had been badly implemented before does not mean there is a jinx on the policy.
Decouple policy from implementation, and vote people in for competence and not policy.
The only solution is organizational and never technological.