Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 8th Nov 2012 20:54 UTC, submitted by Elv13
Thread beginning with comment 541624
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Miguel has already spoken about these criticisms.
by renox on Fri 9th Nov 2012 14:35
in reply to "RE[4]: Miguel has already spoken about these criticisms."
RE[6]: Miguel has already spoken about these criticisms.
by lucas_maximus on Fri 9th Nov 2012 15:18
in reply to "RE[5]: Miguel has already spoken about these criticisms."
RE[5]: Miguel has already spoken about these criticisms.
by segedunum on Fri 9th Nov 2012 20:24
in reply to "RE[4]: Miguel has already spoken about these criticisms."
He was talking about the attitude that is was okay to break APIs, is prevalent because of Linus.
He totally misunderstood that, which is probably why he doesn't understand a lot of things. To blame his mistakes and that of others on the kernel just shows how little he understands.
Linus has no qualms about breaking APIs within the kernel, but what the kernel did not do was break compatibility with userspace applications - i.e. external interfaces. That's something Linux desktop components have done time and time again.
Edited 2012-11-09 20:25 UTC
RE[6]: Miguel has already spoken about these criticisms.
by lucas_maximus on Sat 10th Nov 2012 09:03
in reply to "RE[5]: Miguel has already spoken about these criticisms."
He totally misunderstood that, which is probably why he doesn't understand a lot of things. To blame his mistakes and that of others on the kernel just shows how little he understands.
No he didn't misunderstand that, you guys keep on misunderstanding the fact it is about the attitude ... the specifics are not important.
Software Engineering is as much about attitude as it is competence.
Linus has no qualms about breaking APIs within the kernel, but what the kernel did not do was break compatibility with userspace applications - i.e. external interfaces. That's something Linux desktop components have done time and time again.
Oh goody ... well people <insert device> are still breaking after updates.





Member since:
2009-08-18
Well you suck at reading comprehension.
He was talking about the attitude that is was okay to break APIs, is prevalent because of Linus. While people could argue about whether this is true or not it really doesn't matter whos fault it is.
Breaking APIs is the problem with no path to follow while transitioning. Which is what the blog post is about.
Edited 2012-11-09 14:19 UTC