Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 8th Nov 2012 20:54 UTC, submitted by Elv13
Thread beginning with comment 541679
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Miguel has already spoken about these criticisms.
by lucas_maximus on Sat 10th Nov 2012 09:09
in reply to "RE: Miguel has already spoken about these criticisms."
No It wasn't.
It doesn't matter even if he was part of the cause of the API churn.
He acknowledged:
* It exists
* He was partly to blame.
It is irrelevant he might have been part of it or even started it. Hindsight is 20/20 as they say. He was a lot younger then and probably didn't know what he knows now.
Edited 2012-11-10 09:09 UTC
RE[3]: Miguel has already spoken about these criticisms.
by segedunum on Sat 10th Nov 2012 13:32
in reply to "RE[2]: Miguel has already spoken about these criticisms."
No It wasn't.
Yes it was.
No, I'm afraid it was a rant from someone who now uses a Mac who has used a Linux distribution recently and realised that stuff breaks and had a go at what he perceives to be wrong. Unfortunately, it was then pointed out to him that he was at least partially responsible for most of the problems he cites.
It's called hypocrisy, it does matter and no he didn't acknowledge he was to blame in any way.





Member since:
2005-07-06
Miguel's post was nonsense and more than a bit ironic, because as Alan Cox pointed out, he started and caused many of the fundamental problems. Much of the software he was at least partly responsible for coming up with was of such poor quality that it went through the very API churn and develop dissilusionment that he is talking about.