Linked by pepa on Fri 9th Nov 2012 23:18 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 541714
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Not at all. There's a bug report* about making it even easier to get a GNOME2-like setup under GNOME Shell for the people that still want that kind of Windows 95-inspired experience.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=685744
Why do all UI projects feel it necessary to change a design proven by 20 years use (Win 8 UI, Unity, GNOME) ?
UIs 20 years ago can be seen more different than the change now...
And Unity seems to work out fine ( http://www.osnews.com/thread?541935 ), also in the sense that it better utilises widescreens.




Member since:
2008-05-03
Why do all UI projects feel it necessary to change a design proven by 20 years use (Win 8 UI, Unity, GNOME) ?
The assumptions seem to be:
(1) Something's old, therefore it must be changed
(2) We know what people want, so we'll make the change without extensive user testing
Dumb.