Linked by pepa on Fri 9th Nov 2012 23:18 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 541726
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Have you seen http://razor-qt.org/ as yet? Might be along the lines of what you're chasing.
Have you seen http://razor-qt.org/ as yet? Might be along the lines of what you're chasing.
Aye, I am aware of that, but it's still too raw, and it still takes too many cues from KDE. The theme needs a lot of work, for example, and judging from the screenshots the applications and settings use free space quite inefficiently.
I am interested in the project in general, though, and in general I have a good feeling about it. I could definitely see Razor-Qt becoming a high-class DE in the future, and I actually really hope it will do exactly that. Definitely a project worth keeping an eye on!
What are you using on the desktop, WereCatf?
You're asking the wrong person. I don't use Linux on the desktop, it's simply too broken. But I use XFCE in my VM atm because I just haven't found anything better. There are some things that I'd want XFCE to do differently, but it still suits me better than the others.
KDE is just... it's all over the god damn place, there's gazillion redundant features and options there, and there's literally no consistency there: just take a look at how many different places are theming-settings spread over, how many tabs and options are constantly visible in those, and how in some places the system offers you the option for KDE to automatically download and install themes you choose, in an other place the system only allows you to install from local filesystem, and in some places you have to drop to the command-line to install the themes!
I haven't got the vaguest idea what you're looking at be honest, but it ain't KDE. The theme stuff is all from the same place because KDE uses a really novel thing called component reuse.
Mind you, I've heard this repeated many times pretty much ad hominem over many years.





Member since:
2006-02-15
Qt itself isn't bad, it's great for developing cross-platform stuff, for example, but I personally can't stand KDE. KDE is just... it's all over the god damn place, there's gazillion redundant features and options there, and there's literally no consistency there: just take a look at how many different places are theming-settings spread over, how many tabs and options are constantly visible in those, and how in some places the system offers you the option for KDE to automatically download and install themes you choose, in an other place the system only allows you to install from local filesystem, and in some places you have to drop to the command-line to install the themes!
I would love a DE with similar approach and values as the GNOME 2 had, but with Qt as the toolkit. Then again, I only use Linux on servers or in a VM, so maybe my opinion just doesn't count.