Linked by Howard Fosdick on Thu 8th Nov 2012 20:12 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 541729
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Also what about people without fingerprints?
No problem, just toss out dupes that have clearly defined fingerprints. People without fingerprints make up less than 1% of the population so their impact would be negligible.
That would be much better than the current system where people vote for the dead/disabled/elderly/apathetic.
http://pjmedia.com/jchristianadams/2012/05/16/53000-dead-voters-fou...




Member since:
2006-01-22
Fingerprint? Ok, THAT is the sign of a oppressive (maybe repressive) regime. Also what about people without fingerprints? This happens. (lost fingers or no fingerprints through working some sort of manual labor that erodes fingerprints, e.g. making chain mails for the Lord of the Rings movies)