Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 10th Nov 2012 01:41 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 541742
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Comment by Drumhellar
by some1 on Sat 10th Nov 2012 04:23
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by Drumhellar"
It is also done in a relatively reasonable manner. The ads appear only in those built-in apps that rely on ongoing refreshed content -- i.e., apps that have ongoing licensing costs.
You'd think that of all companies Microsoft can secure itself a very good deal on standard content like news and weather. It seems more plausible that they're just showing off in-app ads to other developers.
RE[3]: Comment by Drumhellar
by ze_jerkface on Sat 10th Nov 2012 13:42
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by Drumhellar"
RE[3]: Comment by Drumhellar
by JAlexoid on Tue 13th Nov 2012 09:59
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by Drumhellar"




Member since:
2011-05-19
There are ads on pay-television.
There are ads inside mass-transit buses, even though they charge fares.
There are ads on my Kindle, even though I paid for it.
There are ads at the back of trade paperbacks, for other books from the same publisher.
There are ads in print newspapers, even after you've paid to subscribe to them.
Thus, Windows 8 is very much in line with other hybrid models, in which the user pays something, and the advertiser pays something.
It is also done in a relatively reasonable manner. The ads appear only in those built-in apps that rely on ongoing refreshed content -- i.e., apps that have ongoing licensing costs. If you don't use those apps, then you don't see any ads.
If there were ads in Mail, or Explorer, or the desktop wallpaper -- then that would of course be a different matter!