Linked by pepa on Fri 9th Nov 2012 23:18 UTC
Gnome "I'm writing to inform you that the release team discussed Drop or Fix Fallback Mode yesterday. We've come to the conclusion that we can't maintain fallback mode in reasonable quality, and are better off dropping it." Gnome-fallback has been my refuge, as I find both Unity and Gnome 3's shell unusable. Yes, we have been warned this would happen. I thought the cost of maintaining gnome-panel would be so low that it might never need to happen. But as it appears, it is deemed necessary. As for me, I'm bound for something Qt, as I am very angry at Gnome for abandoning its 'classic' users.
Thread beginning with comment 541785
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Why?
by pepa on Sat 10th Nov 2012 08:49 UTC in reply to "Why?"
Member since:

And I suspect they're hoping to force fallback users into the Gnome shell fold. I think it will work against them.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: Why?
by segedunum on Sat 10th Nov 2012 13:45 in reply to "RE: Why?"
segedunum Member since:

I think that's exactly what they're doing - trying to force people into their indoctrination.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[2]: Why?
by thebluesgnr on Sat 10th Nov 2012 19:31 in reply to "RE: Why?"
thebluesgnr Member since:

Not at all. There's a bug report* about making it even easier to get a GNOME2-like setup under GNOME Shell for the people that still want that kind of Windows 95-inspired experience.

Reply Parent Score: 2