Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 8th Nov 2012 20:54 UTC, submitted by Elv13
Thread beginning with comment 541971
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[10]: Miguel has already spoken about these criticisms.
by lucas_maximus on Mon 12th Nov 2012 09:37
in reply to "RE[9]: Miguel has already spoken about these criticisms."
No you are still wrong.
He is actually talking about the decision for internal driver interfaces which is more widely known than the kernel's external interfaces.
Other developers decided to follow it, without understanding the difference between the two.
I think miguel understands the difference fine.
Anyway back to the initial point, it doesn't matter who fault it was ... it has happened and developers have gotten pissed off with the situation.
Edited 2012-11-12 09:38 UTC




Member since:
2005-07-06
No, and it looks as if I'm going to have to point this out otherwise we'll be in Punch and Judy territory:
Linus pointed out that he was completely, totally and utterly wrong about this because the kernel has never changed any interfaces for anything outside the kernel - i.e. userspace. People switched from Linux 2.4 to 2.6 without any problems whatsoever. People upgrade their kernels all the time without userspace stuff breaking.
He's completely misunderstanding what drivers are actually a part of and what he's actually talking about and trying to blame the internals of the kernel for the mess of the Linux desktop that he perpetuated.
The problem with Linux desktops is that they change their external interfaces every five minutes. Even when things are API and ABI compatible, expected behaviour changes. It's just funny that even now, after all this time, he just doesn't understand what the problems actually are and is trying to palm them off on something and someone else.